<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Light Led Bar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.supportthevote.com/light-led-bar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.supportthevote.com/light-led-bar/</link>
	<description>Hydroponic Kits, Hps Grow Lights and More...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.supportthevote.com/light-led-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supportthevote.com/light-led-bar/#comment-787</guid>
		<description>&quot;Do you have any references to these studies?&quot;

Unfortunately I can locate none at the moment. My main reason for believing such is my own experience when I replicated a test with a 10 segment LED bar graph, with the segments driven in 10% duty increments, and to my eye the gradations were closer to logarithmic (I had printouts of a linear and logarithmic scale, both in 10 gradations to match to). The phenomenon may be due to some other factor but I have seen it in practice.

A photograph of the experiment showed a linear scale, but this was not as it appears to the eye, probably due to some process in the eye or the brain in processing the image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Do you have any references to these studies?&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately I can locate none at the moment. My main reason for believing such is my own experience when I replicated a test with a 10 segment LED bar graph, with the segments driven in 10% duty increments, and to my eye the gradations were closer to logarithmic (I had printouts of a linear and logarithmic scale, both in 10 gradations to match to). The phenomenon may be due to some other factor but I have seen it in practice.</p>
<p>A photograph of the experiment showed a linear scale, but this was not as it appears to the eye, probably due to some process in the eye or the brain in processing the image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamcdia</title>
		<link>http://www.supportthevote.com/light-led-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>williamcdia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 02:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.supportthevote.com/light-led-bar/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>#Z-Bar #High #Power #LED #Lamp- #Metallic #Black/Cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#Z-Bar #High #Power #LED #Lamp- #Metallic #Black/Cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.supportthevote.com @ 2012-02-08 20:43:14 -->
